Note - MY world. Be aware it is that of a very dogmatic old man who is still thinking like he did back then but prepared to listen to today
Wednesday, 1 October 2008
Six weeks wait
It would be nice to have the situation whereby this evidence may be given by law but; even so, it is possible to have the conversations proven by inquiry. If one intercepts a call discussing a meeting at the place X, be at place X at the designated time and use the cameras and remote microphones. No need to refer to the intercept in any great detail. Treat it as if it were something received from an informer.
Holding onto someone for a period in excess of 42 days just because you can do so is counter-productive. It just introduces another element into a trial and allows defence counsel to add another "injustice" or "element of doubt" into their response to the case. It will also damage community relations, make intelligence gathering more difficult and possibly ruin the lives of innocent people .
Thursday, 28 December 2006
Get serious
Nice to see that we are really serious with this anti-terrorist thing.
The police side is that it is no offence to hold extremist views. We have - it seems - evidence from intercepts but cannot use it because of concerns about civil liberties.
And all this when the boss of the Met police has said that the threat level of a significant terrorist action is high and increasing daily.
TODAY'S GUEST BLOG
Not evil - just misguided
Friday, 24 November 2006
Master of the terrorist universe
Some while back I expressed doubt about the self-confessed terrorist who had admitted (allegedly) planning to blow up just about everything everywhere. The organisational requirement was immense, procurement of materials and support was a mammoth task and timing required some sort of atomic clock.
So seems I am not the only one with doubts.